Steel framing vs Wood
The frame is the backbone of any building, so when choosing a construction material, it must be both safe and secure. Steel and wood framing both have pros and cons, such as cost, longevity, sustainability, and flexibility during the construction process.
The ability of customise your design
cold-formed steel (CFS) is seen as one of the most versatile materials. CFS is popular among architects and designers because it has superior consistency, strength and reliability.
Sustainability is key
while wood framing is often seen as natural, it has a high wastage. Steel framing, on the other hand, can be produced with minimal waste which is then reused and recycled
Lifetime durability
CFS, unlike wood framing, doesn’t retain water, making it stable and more robust over time
Labor costs
the frames being much lighter, there can be less labor required onsite
Structural integrity
steel frame buildings have less movement over time because they do not twist, warp, shrink, or buckle, whereas timber frames
Insurance costs for steel framing
non-combustible and therefore a much safer, more reliable alternative to other framing materials on the market. As a result, insurance companies have rewarded contractors for using CFS with lower building insurance